Canadian Capitalist Logo Dark
No Result
View All Result
Sunday, November 16, 2025
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Real Estate
  • Retirement
  • Tax Savings
  • Trivia
  • Resources
Subscribe
Canadian Capitalist Logo Light
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Real Estate
  • Retirement
  • Tax Savings
  • Trivia
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
Canadian Capitalist Logo Mobile
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorised

The Problem with Leverage

by Ram Balakrishnan
June 14, 2009
Reading Time: 2 mins read
128 6
0
why are canadian bank stocks up today
153
SHARES
1.9k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linkedin

I’ve always been under the impression that leverage will likely be profitable over the long run — say a period of 10 or 20 years (you can find past posts on leverage here, here and here). Stocks beat bonds and cash handily over the long term, right? But is it really the case? What does market history tell us? To find the answer, we’ll turn to Triumph of the Optimists, in which authors Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh and Mike Staunton present market returns for stocks, bonds and bills from 1900 to 2000 for 16 different countries including Canada and look at excess returns of stocks over bills. As an investor borrowing at 3% and earning 7% in the stock market, only gets to keep the difference, it makes sense to look at the equity risk premium versus bills. Assuming, investors can borrow at the T-bill rate, the sequence of excess returns available from stocks for every 10-year period starting in 1900 is:

3.5%, 2.4%, 8.8%, -0.5%, 8.4%, 12.9%, 5.2%, 2.5%, 0.0%, 3.5%

Unfortunately, investors are not in the lucky position of the Government of Canada and are unlikely to be able to borrow at the current T-bill rate of 0.25%. The best they can usually do is borrow at Prime, which is currently 2.25% or a 2% premium over the T-bill rate. Let’s deduct a premium of 2% from the equity premium sequence above to find out how successful leverage would have been in past 10-year periods:

1.5%, 0.4%, 6.8%, -2.5%, 6.4%, 10.9%, 3.2%, 0.5%, -2.0%, 1.5%

In other words, in 2 out of 10 10-year periods, leverage would have been unprofitable and barely profitable in 2 more. It is only in 4 out of 10 periods that leverage would have yielded substantial profits.

How about 20-year periods? Here’s the sequence of excess returns from stocks over bills after deducting a 2% premium:

0.9%, 3.6%, 2.1%, 1.9%, 8.6%, 7.0%, 1.9%, -0.8%, -0.2%

Again, the record is clear. Leveraging would have provided outsized returns in some periods and mediocre or quite poor results in others.

It is only over 30-year periods that all excess returns are positive:

2.9%, 1.5%, 3.5%, 4.8%, 6.8%, 4.8%, 0.5%, 0.1%

Leverage is typically advertised as a profitable strategy over the long term. But market history suggests that investors may sometimes have to wait a long time before the strategy turns profitable.

Related posts:

  1. Finding a Financial Advisor, Part 1
  2. Carnival of Debt Reduction # 19
  3. The Income Tax Cut is Better
  4. This and That
Share61Tweet38Share11

Get real time update about this post categories directly on your device, subscribe now.

Unsubscribe
Previous Post

This and That: Choosing an advisor, Currency Hedging and more…

Next Post

Withholding tax & TFSA Investments

Ram Balakrishnan

Ram Balakrishnan

Related Posts

Why you cant afford a house in Canada

Why You Can’t Afford A Home In Canada?

January 24, 2022
563
investing benefits
Investing

Finding a Financial Advisor, Part 1

June 19, 2021
2.2k
investing in bitcoin

Is it time to invest in Bitcoins again?

May 13, 2019
2k
when do reits liquidate
Uncategorised

Performance of Currency-Neutral S&P 500 Index Funds

January 19, 2014
2k
is mortgage interest tax deductible
Uncategorised

The 2013 Sleepy Portfolio Report Card

January 12, 2014
2k
how to buy individual stocks in canada
Uncategorised

Asset Class Returns for 2013

January 5, 2014
2k
Next Post
how to pick a reit

Withholding tax & TFSA Investments

Please login to join discussion
Canadian Capitalist

© 2022 Canadian Capitalist

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertisement
  • Contact Us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Real Estate
  • Retirement
  • Tax Savings
  • Trivia
  • Resources

© 2022 Canadian Capitalist

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Facebook
Sign In with Google
Sign In with Linked In
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Facebook
Sign Up with Google
Sign Up with Linked In
OR

Fill the forms below to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
two man and woman standing on doorway
The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read - Mark Twain