Canadian Capitalist Logo Dark
No Result
View All Result
Monday, September 25, 2023
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Real Estate
  • Retirement
  • Tax Savings
  • Trivia
  • Resources
Subscribe
Canadian Capitalist Logo Light
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Real Estate
  • Retirement
  • Tax Savings
  • Trivia
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
Canadian Capitalist Logo Mobile
No Result
View All Result
Home Tax Savings

Own Foreign Stocks or ETFs? You may have to File Form T1135

by Ram Balakrishnan
March 28, 2012
Reading Time: 2 mins read
138 6
0
investing advisor
164
SHARES
2.1k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linkedin

As I am preparing my income taxes, I am reminded yet again of the trap that the Canada Revenue Agency has set for taxpayers in the T1 General form with this innocuous question:

“Did you own or hold foreign property at any time in 2011 with a total cost of more than CAN$100,000? (See “Foreign Income” in help for details)”

An unsuspecting taxpayer might reasonably infer “foreign property” to mean a condominium in Florida or a not-so-secret-these-days Swiss bank account and owning nothing of the kind might answer “No” to the question. The General Income Tax and Benefit Guide put out by the CRA does not shed much light on the question either.

To find out the details of what constitutes “specified foreign property” in CRA’s eyes, one has to turn to the information provided in Form T1135 Foreign Income Verification Statement. In it, CRA defines “shares of non-resident corporations held by the resident filer or on deposit with a Canadian or foreign broker” and “interests in mutual funds that are organized in a foreign jurisdiction” as specified foreign property. In other words, if our taxpayer held US stocks or ETFs with a cost of more than $100,000 in a Canadian investment brokerage account, she must answer “Yes” to the question in T1 General and file Form T1135.

Curiously, a Canadian taxpayer owning what one would reasonably consider “foreign property”, say a condo in Miami purchased for $250,000, strictly for personal use, does not have to file T1135! The taxpayer, who simply assumed that foreign stocks held in taxable Canadian brokerage accounts for which trading summaries are filed annually with the CRA and income taxes are paid, has to file T1135 if the cost of foreign stock holdings exceeds $100,000.

The penalties for failing to complete and file T1135 by the due date (April 30) are severe. The penalty for filing late is $25 per day for up to 100 days (maximum of $2,500). Since the penalty is levied for each year, a taxpayer could face penalties running into the tens of thousands of dollars.

Some notes about Form T1135:

– If you own foreign stocks in joint investment accounts, you should file Form T1135 only if the cost of your share of the investments exceeds $100,000.

– Canadian mutual funds and ETFs that own foreign stocks or ETFs are not considered “specified foreign property”.

– Foreign stocks and ETFs held in registered accounts such as RRSPs and TFSAs are also not considered “foreign property”.

– As already mentioned, real estate owned in foreign countries and held strictly for personal use are not considered “foreign property”.

It is entirely appropriate to levy strict penalties on taxpayers trying to hide income in foreign jurisdictions. It does not seem reasonable to levy stiff penalties on taxpayers who are reporting and paying taxes on investments held in Canadian accounts but inadvertently missed filing paperwork. In fact, the punishment strikes me as cruel and unjust.

NB: This post is of an informational nature and should not be construed as tax advice.

Related posts:

  1. Comments on RRSP Tip # 1
  2. QuickTax Disappoints
  3. What’s New in StudioTax 2008?
  4. Family Tax Cut: Big Tax Savings for Some Families
Share66Tweet41Share11

Get real time update about this post categories directly on your device, subscribe now.

Unsubscribe
Previous Post

TD Waterhouse Launches Mobile Trading

Next Post

Budget 2012: Changes to Old Age Security

Ram Balakrishnan

Ram Balakrishnan

Related Posts

Investing

Questrade vs Wealthsimple 2023 Update: Breaking Down the Differences for Canadian Investor

January 11, 2023
2.2k
aerial photography of rural
Real Estate

First-Time Homebuyers: Is the First Home Savings Account (FHSA) Right for You?

January 9, 2023
2.2k
Maximizing Your Education Savings: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Group RESP in 2023
Investing

Maximizing Your Education Savings in 2023: The Advantages and Disadvantages of Group RESPs

January 9, 2023
2k
Receiving cash gifts from overseas family in Canada.
Tax Savings

Tax Implications of Receiving a Cash Gift in Canada

January 8, 2023
2.9k
Maximizing Your Retirement Finances: Should You Sell Your Home?
Retirement

Is Selling Your Home: A Smart Decision for Retirement?

January 7, 2023
2k
Your TFSA investing strategies will need a rethink in 2023.
Tax Savings

Why you should rethink your TFSA investment strategy in the 2023?

January 6, 2023
2.1k
Next Post
stock brokers in canada

Budget 2012: Changes to Old Age Security

Please login to join discussion
Canadian Capitalist

© 2022 Canadian Capitalist

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertisement
  • Contact Us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Real Estate
  • Retirement
  • Tax Savings
  • Trivia
  • Resources

© 2022 Canadian Capitalist

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Facebook
Sign In with Google
Sign In with Linked In
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Facebook
Sign Up with Google
Sign Up with Linked In
OR

Fill the forms below to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
two man and woman standing on doorway
The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read - Mark Twain