Thanks to a post on Sitting Pretty Financially, I found an interesting article that talks about personal financial ratios that we could use to analyze our financial standing.
The three ratios that the article talks about are:
- The savings to income ratio would be familiar to readers of The Millionaire Next Door
. Savings is defined as the current value of financial assets not including the family home.
- Debt to income ratio, with debt being all obligations like mortgages, car loans, student loans, credit card debt etc.
- The savings rate, which is the percentage of pre-tax income that an individual saves every year.
The article also provides guidelines for the financial ratios at different ages with the only constant being the savings rate at 12% of pre-tax income. For example, a 30-year old just starting out in life is expected to have a S/I ratio of 0.1 and a high D/I ratio of 1.7 and a 50-year old starting to think about his retirement should have a S/I ratio of 4.5 and a D/I ratio of 0.75. The assumption is that when retiring at age 65, an individual should have savings of 12 times income and no debt.
While useful as a benchmark, the personal finance ratios are as meaningless as stock ratios without a context. An individual with a very high savings rate doesn’t need anywhere close to a nest egg of 12 times income, since they are frugal to begin with. Also, I would argue that home equity should at least partially be included in the savings column as a paid-off house provides “income” in the form of a rent that would otherwise have to be paid.









