Canadian Capitalist Logo Dark
No Result
View All Result
Tuesday, March 21, 2023
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Real Estate
  • Retirement
  • Tax Savings
  • Trivia
  • Resources
Subscribe
Canadian Capitalist Logo Light
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Real Estate
  • Retirement
  • Tax Savings
  • Trivia
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
Canadian Capitalist Logo Mobile
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorised

Selling puts isn’t “money for nothing”

by Ram Balakrishnan
March 15, 2009
Reading Time: 3 mins read
124 9
0
can insurance companies cancel your policy
152
SHARES
1.9k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linkedin

After experiencing middling success with building a portfolio stuffed with income trusts, Derek Foster is trying out a new strategy of selling puts on stocks on his watch list and collecting the premiums. In online forums such as Canadian Business and Financial Webring and media interviews Derek has claimed that he is receiving “money for nothing” and marketing his half-baked ideas in a new book. I’ll show why selling puts is not the free lunch Derek claims it to be – something readers of his new book might want to keep in mind.

If you are already familiar with Derek’s strategy of selling puts, you may want to skip this section. Let’s say Derek thinks that shares of ABC Corp. (Ticker: ABC), which is currently trading at $50, would be interesting at $45. He would like to purchase 1,000 shares and finds that put options on ABC at a strike price of $45 can be sold for $2 per share. So, he sells put options on ABC, collects a premium of $2,000 and sets aside $45,000 in a cash account to cover the contingency that ABC falls in price to $45 or below and the option is exercised by the buyer (He could buy back the option but for the purposes of this discussion, the costs will be the same).

As it turns out, I think ABC would be interesting at $45 as well and would like to purchase 1,000 shares. But, unlike Derek, I didn’t know enough to earn premium income by selling puts or know enough to stay clear. Either way, I have the cash sitting in a brokerage account.

Now, let’s see why Derek claims his strategy is “money for nothing”. There are two possibilities with ABC stock. It never reaches $45 and both Derek and I did not get to enjoy any upside. Or, the stock reaches $45 and both Derek and I now own the stock. It keeps falling to $40 and both Derek and I have experienced a loss but Derek’s loss is smaller because he collected $2,000 in option premiums. How’s that for financial alchemy?

It seems like a very clever argument but if you had a nagging feeling that there has to be catch, you’d be right. Here is the key difference: I have the intention of buying the stock at $45; Derek might have the obligation to do so. There is a world of difference between the two.

Consider the following scenario now: With the stock trading at $47, ABC’s CEO has suddenly resigned. Rumours are swirling that he has written a letter to the board admitting to cooking the books and all hell has broken lose. The trading on the stock has been halted pending a news conference.

What would I do? I would be foolish to think that the stock is still interesting at $45. Most likely, I’ll decide that ABC isn’t worth the trouble after all and abandon my intention to buy. At the very least, I would want to wait for the dust to settle and more clarity to emerge. And I have my capital intact.

Derek has no such luxury. He has a contract to buy the stock at $45. If the stock hits $25 when trading resumes, he is looking at a $18,000 loss – substantially higher than the $2,000 premiums he collected.

Investors tempted to speculate in the options market should remember that options are a zero-sum game before commissions and expenses. The buyers of the puts Derek is selling are not giving away free money out of the goodness of their hearts. They are paying the seller to assume some risks they are not willing to bear and it would be wise to assume that the premiums reflect the risks involved. Only fools rush in where angels fear to tread.

Related posts:

  1. Finding a Financial Advisor, Part 1
  2. Carnival of Debt Reduction # 19
  3. The Income Tax Cut is Better
  4. This and That
Share61Tweet38Share11

Get real time update about this post categories directly on your device, subscribe now.

Unsubscribe
Previous Post

This and That: Warren Buffett Marathon edition

Next Post

Bear Market Valuation Indicators?

Ram Balakrishnan

Ram Balakrishnan

Related Posts

Why you cant afford a house in Canada

Why You Can’t Afford A Home In Canada?

January 24, 2022
364
investing benefits
Investing

Finding a Financial Advisor, Part 1

June 19, 2021
2.1k
investing in bitcoin

Is it time to invest in Bitcoins again?

May 13, 2019
2k
when do reits liquidate
Uncategorised

Performance of Currency-Neutral S&P 500 Index Funds

January 19, 2014
2k
is mortgage interest tax deductible
Uncategorised

The 2013 Sleepy Portfolio Report Card

January 12, 2014
2k
how to buy individual stocks in canada
Uncategorised

Asset Class Returns for 2013

January 5, 2014
1.9k
Next Post
passive income millionaire

Bear Market Valuation Indicators?

Please login to join discussion
Canadian Capitalist

© 2022 Canadian Capitalist

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertisement
  • Contact Us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Real Estate
  • Retirement
  • Tax Savings
  • Trivia
  • Resources

© 2022 Canadian Capitalist

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Facebook
Sign In with Google
Sign In with Linked In
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Facebook
Sign Up with Google
Sign Up with Linked In
OR

Fill the forms below to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
two man and woman standing on doorway
The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read - Mark Twain