Canadian Capitalist Logo Dark
No Result
View All Result
Saturday, September 23, 2023
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Real Estate
  • Retirement
  • Tax Savings
  • Trivia
  • Resources
Subscribe
Canadian Capitalist Logo Light
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Real Estate
  • Retirement
  • Tax Savings
  • Trivia
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
Canadian Capitalist Logo Mobile
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorised

Should I participate in my employer’s matching program?

by Ram Balakrishnan
March 17, 2008
Reading Time: 3 mins read
137 1
0
is insurance expense a liability
158
SHARES
2k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linkedin

Mike from Quest for Four Pillars shares his spreadsheet, which shows that it takes a long time for non-match RRSP with low-MER funds to catch up with a group RRSP with an employer match but offers only high-MER funds.

Last week’s post on a survey that indicated how a lot of employees who have the opportunity of getting an employee match on some of their retirement account contributions don’t take advantage of it attracted a few comments to the effect that if the mutual funds that were offered had a high MER (management expense ratio) then perhaps the matching contribution wasn’t such a great deal after all.

I decided to try and do a simple analysis (spreadsheet) to figure out if it was possible for high MER fund options to counteract the benefit of the free money contribution. I thought it was pretty unlikely that the money saved with low cost investments would make up for the free money but it’s good to run some numbers and make sure.

The scenario I choose is the extreme case where the employee who contributes to the company group retirement account (such as a RRSP or 401(k)) to get the match, cannot transfer their money to a low cost discount broker as long as they are still working at the company.

First of all – let’s look at the scenario:
One worker who starts off making $100,000 per year enrolls in the group plan and contributes $3,000 per year and gets a 100% match on 3% of salary per year. Unfortunately the average MER of the funds is 3.0%.

The second worker making the same starting salary, decides to invest in low cost index funds and he enjoys an average MER of 0.5%. This worker contributes the same $3,000 each year and does not get the matching 3% contribution.

Now let’s look at the multitude of assumptions:

  • Gross rate of return of both investors is exactly 8.0%. If you believe that managed funds outperform index funds then read this.
  • Net rate of return for the matching investor is 5% (8%-3%).
  • Net rate of return for the non-matching investor is 7.5% (8% – 0.5%).
  • All contributions including the company match are made on January 1 of each year.
  • The contributions increases 3% each year.
  • The investor who buys low cost index funds has his payroll tax reduced so they are making the same gross contribution as the matching investor.
  • Both employees only contribute up the match amount (3%) and no more.

Results
The employee that invests in the account with the company matching contribution does much better than the employee who invests in low costs investments with no match.

At first the employee with the matching contribution does much better than the low expense investor (with no match) but later on when the difference in the portfolio expenses becomes larger than the matching contribution, the low cost investor starts catching up and surpasses the employee match investor in the 46th year.

Anybody here planning to work 46 years for one company? Anybody planning to work 46 years period?? I didn’t think so!

Other scenarios
What if you can do periodic transfers of your group retirement money, including matching contributions to a discount broker? In that case the cost savings of the matching investor would be decreased significantly and that would make the company match even more attractive.

What if the MERs of your employer investments are less than the 3% used in the example? Then the employer match account is even better than with the higher MER investments.

What if you contribute at a rate higher than the company matches for? i.e. the company matches 3% of your salary but you contribute 10%. In that case, the contribution that is getting matched (3%) gives you the same benefit as in my example. For the remaining 7%, there is no benefit to contributing it to your company employee plan unless it provides low cost investing options.

Summary
In most cases an employee will be far better off taking advantage of any kind of company matching contribution in their group retirement account regardless of the fees charged in the company plan and regardless of any transfer-out restrictions.

If you haven’t done so already, do check out the Quest for Four Pillars blog and subscribe to the blog feed.

Related posts:

  1. Finding a Financial Advisor, Part 1
  2. Carnival of Debt Reduction # 19
  3. Q&A with Vanguard Canada
  4. Reader Question on Bond Allocation
Share63Tweet40Share11

Get real time update about this post categories directly on your device, subscribe now.

Unsubscribe
Previous Post

Political Football with RESPs

Next Post

Bear Stearns’ Cautionary Tale

Ram Balakrishnan

Ram Balakrishnan

Related Posts

Why you cant afford a house in Canada

Why You Can’t Afford A Home In Canada?

January 24, 2022
444
investing benefits
Investing

Finding a Financial Advisor, Part 1

June 19, 2021
2.1k
investing in bitcoin

Is it time to invest in Bitcoins again?

May 13, 2019
2k
when do reits liquidate
Uncategorised

Performance of Currency-Neutral S&P 500 Index Funds

January 19, 2014
2k
is mortgage interest tax deductible
Uncategorised

The 2013 Sleepy Portfolio Report Card

January 12, 2014
2k
how to buy individual stocks in canada
Uncategorised

Asset Class Returns for 2013

January 5, 2014
1.9k
Next Post
who pays dividend withholding tax

Bear Stearns' Cautionary Tale

Please login to join discussion
Canadian Capitalist

© 2022 Canadian Capitalist

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertisement
  • Contact Us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Real Estate
  • Retirement
  • Tax Savings
  • Trivia
  • Resources

© 2022 Canadian Capitalist

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Facebook
Sign In with Google
Sign In with Linked In
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Facebook
Sign Up with Google
Sign Up with Linked In
OR

Fill the forms below to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
two man and woman standing on doorway
The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read - Mark Twain