Canadian Capitalist Logo Dark
No Result
View All Result
Sunday, May 18, 2025
  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Real Estate
  • Retirement
  • Tax Savings
  • Trivia
  • Resources
Subscribe
Canadian Capitalist Logo Light
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Real Estate
  • Retirement
  • Tax Savings
  • Trivia
  • Resources
No Result
View All Result
Canadian Capitalist Logo Mobile
No Result
View All Result
Home Uncategorised

Transferring the Family Cottage: There is No Panacea

by Ram Balakrishnan
April 17, 2011
Reading Time: 3 mins read
149 2
0
do mortgage brokers charge fees
172
SHARES
2.2k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Linkedin

Today’s guest post is Part 1 of a 3-part series on estate planning issues surrounding the family cottage, courtesy of Mark Goodfield, a professional accountant who writes the The Blunt Bean Counter Blog. Mark covers accounting, tax and wealth management issues on his blog and if you haven’t checked out his site, please do so. It is excellent. Now, over to Mark…

This is the first blog in a three part series on transferring the family cottage. Today’s blog will deal with the historical nature of the income tax rules, while the second blog will deal with the income tax implications of transferring or gifting a cottage and finally in the third blog, I will discuss alternative income tax planning opportunities that may mitigate or defer income tax upon the transfer of a family cottage.

Canadians love their cottages. They are willing to put up with three hour drives, traffic jams, never ending repairs and maintenance and constant hosting duties for their piece of tranquility by the lake. However, I would suggest the family cottage is one of the most problematic assets for income tax planning purposes, let alone the inherent family politics that are sure to arise.

For purposes of this blog, I will just assume away the family politics issue. I will assume the children will each grab a beer, sit down at a table and work out a cottage sharing schedule to everyone’s satisfaction and while they are at it, agree on how they will share the future ownership of the cottage when their parents transfer the cottage or pass away. I would say a very realistic situation in Canada, not!!!

Let’s also dismiss any illusions some may harbor that they can plan around the taxation issues related to cottages or even avoid them entirely. I can tell you outright, there is no magical solution to solving the income tax issues in regards to a family cottage, just ways to mitigate or defer the issues. Many cottages were purchased years ago and have large unrealized capital gains.

So let’s start by taking a step back in time. Prior to 1981, each spouse could designate their own principal residence (“PR”) which, in most cases, made the income tax implications of disposing or gifting a family cottage a null and void issue. The principal residence exemption (“PRE”) in the Income Tax Act essentially eliminated any capital gain realized when a personal use property was sold or transferred. Families that had a home in the city and a cottage in the country typically did not have to pay tax on any capital gains realized on either property when sold or gifted.

However, for any year after 1981, a family unit (generally considered to be the taxpayer, his or his spouse or common-law partner and unmarried minor children) can only designate one property between them for purposes of the PRE. Although the designation of a property as a PR is a yearly designation, it is only made when there is an actual disposition of a home. For example, if you owned and lived in both a cottage and a house between 2001 and 2011 and sold them both in 2011, you could choose to designate your cottage as your PR for 2001 to 2003 and your house from 2004 to 2011 or any other permutation plus one year (the CRA provides a bonus year because they are just a giving agency :)).

In order to decide which property to designate for which years after 1981, it is always necessary to determine whether there is a larger gain per year on your cottage or your home in the city. Once that determination is made, in most cases it makes sense to designate the property with the larger gain per year as your personal residence for purposes of the PRE.

Click here to continue to the next post in the series on income tax issues surrounding the transfer of a cottage.

Related posts:

  1. Finding a Financial Advisor, Part 1
  2. Carnival of Debt Reduction # 19
  3. The Income Tax Cut is Better
  4. This and That
Share69Tweet43Share12

Get real time update about this post categories directly on your device, subscribe now.

Unsubscribe
Previous Post

This & That: Black Swans, Loonie Prices and more…

Next Post

Transferring the Family Cottage: Tax Issues

Ram Balakrishnan

Ram Balakrishnan

Related Posts

Why you cant afford a house in Canada

Why You Can’t Afford A Home In Canada?

January 24, 2022
558
investing benefits
Investing

Finding a Financial Advisor, Part 1

June 19, 2021
2.2k
investing in bitcoin

Is it time to invest in Bitcoins again?

May 13, 2019
2k
when do reits liquidate
Uncategorised

Performance of Currency-Neutral S&P 500 Index Funds

January 19, 2014
2k
is mortgage interest tax deductible
Uncategorised

The 2013 Sleepy Portfolio Report Card

January 12, 2014
2k
how to buy individual stocks in canada
Uncategorised

Asset Class Returns for 2013

January 5, 2014
1.9k
Next Post
top brokerage in ontario

Transferring the Family Cottage: Tax Issues

Please login to join discussion
Canadian Capitalist

© 2022 Canadian Capitalist

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertisement
  • Contact Us

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Real Estate
  • Retirement
  • Tax Savings
  • Trivia
  • Resources

© 2022 Canadian Capitalist

Welcome Back!

Sign In with Facebook
Sign In with Google
Sign In with Linked In
OR

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Sign Up with Facebook
Sign Up with Google
Sign Up with Linked In
OR

Fill the forms below to register

*By registering into our website, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
two man and woman standing on doorway
The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read - Mark Twain